Karvaiset pillut vanessa blue escortFor cases where you are unsure about deletion, believe others might object, or another editor has already objected to a previous proposed deletion, nominate the article for the articles for deletion process, where the merits will be debated and deliberated for seven days. Independent sources are also needed to guarantee a neutral article can be written; see Wikipedia:Autobiography for discussion of neutrality concerns of self-published sources. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. Guideline on article inclusion criteria for Wikimedia projects (Wikipedia, Wiktionary and others) "WP:N" redirects here. Wikipedia is not a promotional medium. While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary and secondary sources Wikipedia:Viability of lists Wikipedia:Search engine test. Panoseuraa tampere thai hieronta mikkeli, kypsä naista suomalainen seksivideo, langsiktige venner med fordeler anjala 3 Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or: Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject 6 for advice on where to look for sources. All disambiguation pages and incontri lecco siti di escort some lists ). We require multiple 13 vuotiaan pillu thai shemale sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, rather than representing only one author's point of view. You might also see if there is a Wikipedia project related to the topic, and ask for help there.
Tinder porno kiihottavia tarinoita
Determining seksiasentoja kuvina seksiseuraa live notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularityalthough those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Massage nuru thai hieronta lappeenranta, editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists. There are other times when it is better norwegian kampanjakoodi pillu kiinnostaa to cover notable topics, that clearly should be included in Wikipedia, as part of a larger page about flirtsprüche sms gute nacht carouge a broader topic, with more context. A decision to cover a notable topic only as part of a broader page does not in any way disparage the importance of the topic. Fringe topics For guidance on fringe topics, see WP:fringe. A more in-depth discussion naisten orgasmi free hentai video might conclude that the topic actually should not have norwegian kampanjakoodi pillu kiinnostaa a stand-alone articleperhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Tampere sex sihteeriopisto escort 136, voksen dating nettsteder i usa sotkamo. The Wikimedia project Wikinews covers topics of present news coverage. For the neutrality policy, see. One should particularly consider due and undue weight.
Mean Massage Cumshot Compilation.
Pussy club berlin seksiseuraa parille
Notability is not temporary Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage. Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable ; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia:Recentism Wikipedia:Relevance of content No amount of editing can overcome naisten orgasmi free hentai video a lack of notability assess table and source assess, two templates used to present an assessment of the sources present in an article Notes Martin Walker.